Search
Make Good Use of Your Sidebar

Use this space for anything from simple blocks of text to powerful widgets, like our Twitter and Flickr widgets. Learn more.

To access Website Management, hit the 'esc' key or use this Login link.

Thursday
Jul262018

UPDATE - July 25, 2018

On May 10, 2018, the Court of Appeal of British Columbia released its decision to certify the proceeding. The class definition is as follows:

All British Columbia resident natural persons who were Members of Facebook at any time in the period from January 1, 2011, to May 30, 2014, and:

  1. who at any time during this period were registered with Facebook using their real name, or had a profile picture that included an identifiable self-image, or both; and
  2. whose real name, identifiable portrait, or both were used by Facebook in a Sponsored Story.

The Court of Appeal did not make any changes to the common issues certified by the chambers judge. The common issues are as follows: 

Issue 1

What if any Online Actions taken by a Class Member on the Facebook service would constitute express or implied consent to the Class Member’s name or portrait being used in a Sponsored Story, such that it constitutes consent within the meaning of s. 3(2) of the Privacy Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 373?

Issue 2

Is a tort under s. 3(2) of the Privacy Act provable as an independent tort without regard to the elements of s. 1(2) and (3) of the Privacy Act?

Issue 3

Were all or only some Sponsored Stories for the purpose of advertising or promotion within the meaning of s. 3(2) of the Privacy Act?

Issue 4

Does the Privacy Act apply to Facebook in relation to BC residents who used Facebook’s services?

Issue 5

Are Class Members entitled to damages without individual proof of damage pursuant to s. 3(2) of the Privacy Act?

Issue 6

Can the amount of damages be determined on an aggregate basis; if so, in what amount?

Issue 7

Does the Defendant’s conduct justify an award of punitive damages in favour of the Class; if so, in what amount?

Issue 8

Is the Defendant liable to pay interest pursuant to the Court Order Interest Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 79; if so, in what amount?

Click [here] to read the judgment.

Justice Iyer of the Supreme Court of British Columbia has been assigned as the Judicial Management and Trial Judge in the matter.

The Judicial Management Conference has been scheduled for September 7, 2018.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Main | UPDATE – August 25, 2017 »